Particularize Books Conducive To Rights of Man (Great Books in Philosophy)
| Original Title: | Rights of Man |
| ISBN: | 0543954617 (ISBN13: 9780543954619) |
| Edition Language: | English |
| Series: | Great Books in Philosophy |
Thomas Paine
Paperback | Pages: 229 pages Rating: 4.03 | 9374 Users | 176 Reviews
Ilustration Concering Books Rights of Man (Great Books in Philosophy)
“The World is my country, all mankind are my brethren, and to do good is my religion.”The ruling governments have no special rights; they have no privileges and they have no entitlements. At least, they ought not to have according to Paine. For him the government exists to serve; it has a duty to its nation the same way a solider or a peacekeeper may have. And if they break that duty, if they become corrupt, then it is our moral right to call for revolution.
“Whatever is my right as a man is also the right of another; and it becomes my duty to guarantee as well as to possess.”
-"Liberty Leading the People" by Eugène Delacroix, 1830
Revolution is permissible then if the government does not protect the natural rights of man, rights of liberty and society. Why should we exist under the thumb of another man? Paine speaks openly about revolution and argues that the French revolution was an attack against the monarchy as a construct not an attack on the French King specifically. It was politically driven and when the Bastille was taken, it was a supposed symbolic end of an age of imprisonment. The bars of the prison were opened and liberty began, at least, in theory.
Paine was part of a large liberal wave that poured through the west at this time. He despised the idiotic Burke and his Reflections of a Revolution in France. In contrast to Burke’s conservatism, Paine argue that each new generation has the right to choose how they will be governed. Just because our ancestors agreed to something, it doesn’t mean that the people of the present are beholden to it.
His arguments are sound and his intentions benevolent, though I would love no know what he thought of the aftermath of the French Revolution. The dreams of liberty were truly shattered. The only real limiting factor of this work is its complete lack of rhetoric and persuasive devices. Paine was not a very creative writer; he gives you his ideas but he certainly doesn’t sell them to you.
Define About Books Rights of Man (Great Books in Philosophy)
| Title | : | Rights of Man (Great Books in Philosophy) |
| Author | : | Thomas Paine |
| Book Format | : | Paperback |
| Book Edition | : | Anniversary Edition |
| Pages | : | Pages: 229 pages |
| Published | : | November 29th 2000 by Adamant Media Corporation (first published 1791) |
| Categories | : | Philosophy. Politics. Nonfiction. Classics. History |
Rating About Books Rights of Man (Great Books in Philosophy)
Ratings: 4.03 From 9374 Users | 176 ReviewsNotice About Books Rights of Man (Great Books in Philosophy)
I'm re-reading this book in light of the current administration. I'm confident that Pres. Bush played "hookie" the week his college class read & discussed this book.everyone interested in politics & mankind should give this a go!I knew nothing of the French Revolution so I was pleased to see that Paine actually explains much of the situation within his rebuttal of Edmond Burke. While I feel like I missed half the story by skipping over Burkes original essay, I think Paine makes a compelling case for the abandonment of a hereditary government.TRoM is organized really well so even someone of my ignorance of 18th century writings could follow along with his arguments.
Rights of Man by Thomas Paine is an excellent piece of work where Paine focuses on the flaws and ascendancies of one type of government over the other. In the first part, Paine discusses about the various rights of man where he says that men are all of one degree and consequently all men are born equal with equal natural right and every child born into the world must be considered as deriving its existence from god.After that Paine put forwards his inputs by condemning Mr Burke with whose
Flawed but vastly superior to Burke. Paine relies more upon the argument that man has rights, than any form of historical tradition. Paine was right in that there is no political Adam from which all laws derive. People have a right to revolution, because government is a construct of man, not an organic system ordained by god and the dead hand of tradition. Also, the unity of man is an absolute and based upon natural rights, while nobles hold their position through coercion and war. He correctly
Good context having first read Levin's Great Debate. Though, I wouldn't read this without also reading Levin's work, if only for the sake of hearing Burke's legitimate points of view on Paine's shortcoming when it comes to the practicality of government setup.
Thomas Paine was an Englishman, participated in the American Revolution and wrote this book in 1792 from the homonymous declaration coming out of the French revolution to defend these principles. A little book, very well written, well-argued, where it theorizes what the liberals who made the revolutions of this century that is the world today in the West. So he says it would end all wars and the money spent on them would use with older people, children's education, health, country roads, etc.
Natural rights are nonsense on stilts. Still, Paines attacks on monarchy and privilege are fun.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.